잘한 점
한 달 동안 26일을 꾸준히 공부했고, 틀린 문제를 다시 푸는 습관이 자리 잡았습니다. 리스닝은 받아쓰기 연습 이후 강의 문제 정답률이 62%에서 81%까지 올랐어요.
중학교 3학년 · 토플 인터 A반 · 목표 점수 100점
자동채점 정답률과 선생님 서술형 평가를 구분해서 보여 드립니다.
최근 12회 시험 · 리딩·리스닝 정답률
오답 개수가 많은 순서
정답률이 높은 순서
시험·과목별 진단·학습 도구·단어·말하기·오답 재풀이·첨삭까지 모든 학습 활동 (책 읽기·게임 제외) · 항목을 누르면 유형별 결과와 회차별 기록이 펼쳐집니다
| 영역 | 유형 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 리딩 | 일상문 읽기 | 96 | 86% |
| 리딩 | 학술 지문 | 120 | 79% |
| 리딩 | 빈칸 완성 | 60 | 83% |
| 리스닝 | 짧은 응답 | 48 | 88% |
| 리스닝 | 대화 | 60 | 80% |
| 리스닝 | 강의 | 72 | 69% |
| 날짜 | 내용 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13 | 모의시험 4회 | 96 | 정답 79/96 (82%) |
| 10/08 | 수업 시험 · 추론 | 24 | 정답 19/24 (79%) |
| 10/06 | 수업 시험 · 강의 듣기 | 24 | 정답 17/24 (71%) |
| 10/01 | 모의시험 3회 | 96 | 정답 73/96 (76%) |
| 09/24 | 모의시험 2회 | 96 | 정답 68/96 (71%) |
| 09/15 | 모의시험 1회 | 96 | 정답 62/96 (65%) |
| 영역 | 유형 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 리딩 | 추론 | 40 | 68% |
| 리딩 | 세부 정보 | 40 | 90% |
| 리스닝 | 강의 흐름 | 40 | 66% |
| 리스닝 | 대화 목적 | 40 | 73% |
| 날짜 | 내용 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11 | 리딩 유형별 · 추론 | 20 | 정답 15/20 (75%) |
| 10/09 | 리스닝 유형별 · 강의 | 20 | 정답 14/20 (70%) |
| 10/03 | 리딩 유형별 · 추론 | 20 | 정답 13/20 (65%) |
| 09/27 | 리스닝 유형별 · 대화 | 20 | 정답 15/20 (75%) |
| 영역 | 유형 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 라이팅 | 구문·단어 뜻 쓰기 | 60 | 88% |
| 라이팅 | 영어로 쓰기 | 48 | 75% |
| 리스닝 | 문장별 받아쓰기 | 56 | 79% |
| 리스닝 | 리스닝 딕테이션 연습 | 40 | 77% |
| 스피킹 | 문장 암기 말하기 | 32 | 84% |
| 라이팅 | 라이팅 템플릿 | 28 | 평가 4.1 / 5 |
| 날짜 | 내용 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/14 | 구문 학습 DAY 18 | 12 | 정답 11/12 (92%) |
| 10/13 | 문장별 받아쓰기 · 강의 3 | 14 | 정답 11/14 (79%) |
| 10/12 | 라이팅 템플릿 · 토론형 | 4 | 선생님 평가 4.5 / 5 |
| 10/10 | 문장 암기 말하기 · SET 6 | 8 | 정답 7/8 (88%) |
| 10/08 | 구문 학습 DAY 16 | 12 | 정답 10/12 (83%) |
| 영역 | 유형 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 단어 | 단어 스펠링 | 90 | 84% |
| 단어 | 단어 품사 | 90 | 87% |
| 단어 | 단어 뜻 | 90 | 93% |
| 날짜 | 내용 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/14 | 토플 단어 DAY 14 | 30 | 정답 28/30 (93%) |
| 10/11 | 토플 단어 DAY 13 | 30 | 정답 27/30 (90%) |
| 10/08 | 토플 단어 DAY 12 | 30 | 정답 25/30 (83%) |
| 10/05 | 토플 단어 DAY 11 | 30 | 정답 26/30 (87%) |
| 영역 | 유형 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 단어 | 내 단어장 복습 | 72 | 83% |
| 날짜 | 내용 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/12 | 내 단어장 복습 | 12 | 정답 11/12 (92%) |
| 10/07 | 내 단어장 복습 | 12 | 정답 10/12 (83%) |
| 10/02 | 내 단어장 복습 | 12 | 정답 9/12 (75%) |
| 영역 | 유형 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 단어 | 단어 카드 | 220 | 완료 |
| 단어 | 단어 뜻 확인 | 96 | 91% |
| 단어 | 단어 떠올리기 | 96 | 82% |
| 날짜 | 내용 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13 | 단어 카드 · DAY 14 | 40 | 완료 |
| 10/10 | 단어 떠올리기 · DAY 13 | 24 | 정답 20/24 (83%) |
| 10/07 | 단어 뜻 확인 · DAY 12 | 24 | 정답 22/24 (92%) |
| 영역 | 유형 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 스피킹 | 따라 말하기 | 9 | 일치도 89% |
| 스피킹 | 인터뷰 | 5 | 일치도 81% |
| 날짜 | 내용 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/12 | 말하기 연습 · 인터뷰 | 1 | 인식 문장 일치도 84% |
| 10/10 | 말하기 연습 · 따라 말하기 | 1 | 인식 문장 일치도 92% |
| 10/04 | 말하기 연습 · 인터뷰 | 1 | 인식 문장 일치도 79% |
| 영역 | 유형 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 리딩 | 추론 | 20 | 80% |
| 리스닝 | 강의 | 24 | 83% |
| 날짜 | 내용 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13 | 오답 다시 풀기 · 모의시험 4회 | 8 | 정답 7/8 (88%) |
| 10/09 | 오답 다시 풀기 · 추론 | 6 | 정답 5/6 (83%) |
| 10/02 | 오답 다시 풀기 · 모의시험 3회 | 10 | 정답 8/10 (80%) |
| 영역 | 유형 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 라이팅 | AI 추천 문장 고쳐쓰기 | 12 | 92% |
| 스피킹 | AI 추천 문장 고쳐쓰기 | 6 | 83% |
| 날짜 | 내용 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11 | AI 추천 문장 고쳐쓰기 | 4 | 정답 4/4 (100%) |
| 10/05 | AI 추천 문장 고쳐쓰기 | 4 | 정답 3/4 (75%) |
| 영역 | 유형 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 스피킹 | 인터뷰 | 4 | 평균 4.3 / 6 |
| 라이팅 | 이메일 쓰기 | 3 | 평균 4.5 / 6 |
| 라이팅 | 학술 토론 | 3 | 평균 5.0 / 6 |
| 날짜 | 내용 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13 | AI 첨삭 · 토론형 | 1 | 5.5 / 6 |
| 10/11 | AI 첨삭 · 인터뷰 | 1 | 5.0 / 6 |
| 10/09 | AI 첨삭 · 이메일 | 1 | 5.0 / 6 |
| 영역 | 유형 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 단어 | 레벨테스트 · 단어 | 20 | 55% |
| 라이팅 | 레벨테스트 · 문법 | 20 | 50% |
| 리딩 | 레벨테스트 · 리딩 | 35 | 57% |
| 리스닝 | 레벨테스트 · 리스닝 | 20 | 50% |
| 날짜 | 내용 | 문항 | 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/20 | 레벨테스트 · 일반 진단 | 95 | 배정 베이직 |
학습실에서 실제로 공부한 시간만 셉니다 · 게임과 다른 창을 띄운 시간은 제외
회색 칸은 공부하지 않은 날이에요. 쉬었던 날도 빼지 않고 그대로 표시합니다.
화요일에 가장 많이, 일요일에 가장 적게 공부했어요.
2026년 10월 14일 작성
한 달 동안 26일을 꾸준히 공부했고, 틀린 문제를 다시 푸는 습관이 자리 잡았습니다. 리스닝은 받아쓰기 연습 이후 강의 문제 정답률이 62%에서 81%까지 올랐어요.
리딩 추론 문제에서 지문 근거를 확인하기 전에 답을 고르는 경우가 있습니다. 라이팅은 아이디어는 좋지만 문장 연결 표현이 단조로워요.
실제 시험과 같은 6점 기준 · 한 세트 = 인터뷰 4문항 + 이메일 + 토론형 · 학생이 받는 첨삭 화면 그대로 · 막대나 세트를 누르면 6문항이 모두 펼쳐져요
빨강: 고칠 원문 · 파랑: 수정 표현·잘 쓴 표현
한 달 동안 +1.8점 · 인터뷰 3.6 → 5.5 · 라이팅 4.0 → 5.8
인터뷰 4문항 평균 3.6 · 라이팅 2문항 평균 4.0 · 6문항 모두 아래에 펼쳐져 있어요
Thank you for speaking with me about learning from feedback. Think of a piece of advice that helped you improve something you were working on. What was the advice, and how did you use it?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
was from my English teacher. my essay out loud before I submit it. I tried it for my history report and I find many mistakes, like missing words and very long sentences. So I fixed them and my score was than before.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
조언과 활용 방법은 잘 전달했지만 시제와 동사 형태 실수가 반복돼요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
One advice that help me was from my English teacher. She said me to read my essay out loud before I submit it. I tried it for my history report and I find many mistakes, like missing words and very long sentences. So I fixed them and my score was more better than before.
One piece of advice that helped me was from my English teacher. She told me to read my essay out loud before I submit it. I tried it for my history report and I find many mistakes, like missing words and very long sentences. So I fixed them and my score was much better than before.
advice는 셀 수 없는 명사라 a piece of advice로 쓰고, 과거 일이므로 helped예요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
One piece of advice that helped me was to read aloud.
Would you prefer to receive detailed feedback in writing or in a conversation? Explain your preference and describe one disadvantage of the method you choose.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
question right away when I don't understand. In writing, sometimes I read the comment but I don't know what I should change. One disadvantage is I can forget what the teacher said, so I need to write it down quickly.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
선호와 단점을 모두 말해 질문 요구를 충족했어요. 문장 연결을 다듬으면 더 자연스러워요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I prefer the feedback in conversation. Because I can ask question right away when I don't understand. In writing, sometimes I read the comment but I don't know what I should change. One disadvantage is I can forget what the teacher said, so I need to write it down quickly.
I prefer feedback in conversation because I can ask question right away when I don't understand. In writing, sometimes I read the comment but I don't know what I should change. One disadvantage is I can forget what the teacher said, so I need to write it down quickly.
Because만으로 시작하는 문장은 불완전해요. 앞 문장과 연결해요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
I prefer spoken feedback because I can ask questions.
Suppose two experienced people give you conflicting advice about the same project, and you have time to follow only one recommendation. How would you decide which advice to use?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
If two people give me different advice, I will think more about the project. Also I will check which advice is . For example if too much time, I cannot follow it. So I choose the advice that is more realistic.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
판단 기준 두 가지(전문성, 마감)가 좋아요. advice 관련 문법을 정리해야 해요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
If two people give me different advice, I will think which person know more about the project. Also I will check which advice is more fit to the deadline. For example if one advice need too much time, I cannot follow it. So I choose the advice that is more realistic.
If two people give me different advice, I will think which person knows more about the project. Also I will check which advice is more realistic for the deadline. For example if one piece of advice needs too much time, I cannot follow it. So I choose the advice that is more realistic.
단수 주어 person에는 knows를 써요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
I would check which person knows more about the topic.
Some teachers believe that students should be assessed mainly on how much they improve after feedback, rather than on the quality of their final work. Do you agree? Explain your position and discuss one difficulty with your approach.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I agree with this idea a little. how much student learn from feedback, so it is important. But one difficulty is it is hard to measure improvement fairly. at first so they cannot improve a lot. So teacher improvement and final quality.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
찬반 입장과 어려운 점을 모두 말했어요. 기본 문법 실수 때문에 전달력이 떨어져요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I agree with this idea a little. Improvement show how much student learn from feedback, so it is important. But one difficulty is it is hard to measure improvement fairly. Some student already good at first so they cannot improve a lot. So teacher should look both improvement and final quality.
I agree with this idea a little. Improvement shows how much student learn from feedback, so it is important. But one difficulty is it is hard to measure improvement fairly. Some students are already good at first so they cannot improve a lot. So teacher should look at both improvement and final quality.
단수 주어에는 shows를 써요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
Improvement shows how much a student has learned.
You are organizing a research workshop for 24 students on Friday from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. Two participants use wheelchairs. You reserved Room 204, which has step-free access and a projector, but the facilities office has just announced that the building will close at 5:00 p.m. that day. The workshop cannot finish early because a visiting speaker is available only from 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. The office offers two alternatives: Room 310, available for the full two hours but accessible only by stairs, or Room 112, which has step-free access and is available for the full two hours but has no installed projector. A portable projector can be requested at least 24 hours before an event. Today is Wednesday. To: Facilities Coordinator Write an email addressing all three points. Use complete sentences and an appropriate tone. • Explain why the original arrangement and one of the alternatives would not me
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
Dear Facilities Coordinator, I am writing about the research workshop on Friday from 4 to 6 p.m. Room 204 is not good because at 5 p.m., and our speaker can come only from 5 to 6. Also Room 310 is not okay because wheelchairs and it has only stairs. So I want to use Room 112 because it has step-free access and it is available two hours. But it has no projector, so can I request a portable projector? Please confirm the room and projector . Thank you. Harin Kim
세 가지 요구사항을 모두 다뤘어요. 기한 표현과 수 일치를 고치면 4.5점 이상이에요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
Dear Facilities Coordinator, I am writing about the research workshop on Friday from 4 to 6 p.m. Room 204 is not good because the building close at 5 p.m., and our speaker can come only from 5 to 6. Also Room 310 is not okay because two participant use wheelchairs and it has only stairs. So I want to use Room 112 because it has step-free access and it is available two hours. But it has no projector, so can I request a portable projector? Please confirm the room and projector until Thursday noon. Thank you. Harin Kim
Dear Facilities Coordinator, I am writing about the research workshop on Friday from 4 to 6 p.m. Room 204 is not good because the building closes at 5 p.m., and our speaker can come only from 5 to 6. Also Room 310 is not okay because two participants use wheelchairs and it has only stairs. So I want to use Room 112 because it has step-free access and it is available two hours. But it has no projector, so can I request a portable projector? Please confirm the room and projector by Thursday at noon. Thank you. Harin Kim
단수 주어 building에는 closes를 써요.
Dear [name], I am writing to [purpose]. First, [point 1]. Also, [point 2]. Lastly, could you [request] by [deadline]? Thank you for your time. Best regards, [name]
요구사항 3개를 순서대로 하나씩 답해요.
The building closes at 5 p.m. on Friday.
Professor: Our university's group study rooms are often fully booked, yet many remain empty because students do not cancel reservations they no longer need. One proposal would require a small deposit when a room is booked. The deposit would be returned when the group checks in or cancels at least two hours in advance; otherwise it would be lost. Should the university adopt this proposal, or would another approach address the problem more effectively? Explain your reasoning. Nora: A refundable deposit seems fair. A reservation prevents another group from using the room, so students should have a reason to cancel promptly. Because people who attend get their money back, responsible users would not actually pay anything. Eli: Even a temporary charge could discourage students with very little money. Emergencies also make it impossible to give two hours' notice sometimes. I would prefer reminders and a system that releases a room if nobody checks in soon after the booking begins. Write a post responding to the professor's question. State and support your position, and contribute a new ide
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I think . and don't come, so other students cannot use it. If students pay small deposit, they will cancel the reservation when they don't need. Also when they check in, so responsible students don't lose money. But Eli say some students don't have money. I think the university can make the deposit very small, like one dollar. So it will be fair for everyone and the rooms will be used better.
Nora를 지지하고 Eli의 우려에 해결책을 냈어요. 새 아이디어(1달러 보증금)가 좋아요.
입장을 분명히 밝혔어요.
두 학생의 의견을 언급했어요.
이유와 예시를 들었어요.
I think the deposit is good idea. Because many students book room and don't come, so other students cannot use it. If students pay small deposit, they will cancel the reservation when they don't need. Also the money is return when they check in, so responsible students don't lose money. But Eli say some students don't have money. I think the university can make the deposit very small, like one dollar. So it will be fair for everyone and the rooms will be used better.
I think the deposit is a good idea. This is because many students book rooms and don't come, so other students cannot use it. If students pay small deposit, they will cancel the reservation when they don't need. Also the money is returned when they check in, so responsible students don't lose money. But Eli say some students don't have money. I think the university can make the deposit very small, like one dollar. So it will be fair for everyone and the rooms will be used better.
단수 명사 idea 앞에 a가 필요해요.
I agree with [Name] that [position]. Admittedly, [Other] raises a valid point that [concern]. However, [my reason]. For example, [example]. Therefore, [conclusion].
두 의견을 모두 짚고 내 이유와 예시로 이어가요.
I think a refundable deposit is a good idea.
인터뷰 4문항 평균 4.2 · 라이팅 2문항 평균 4.5 · 6문항 모두 아래에 펼쳐져 있어요
Thank you for joining our study about trying unfamiliar activities. Tell me about an activity you tried for the first time. What led you to try it, and what was your initial experience like?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
The first time I tried rock climbing was last summer. to an indoor climbing gym because every weekend. At first I was very nervous because the wall looked so high. But the staff explained how to use the rope and I reached the top. It was hard but really exciting.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
처음 시도한 계기와 첫 경험을 생생하게 말했어요. 시제만 맞추면 좋아요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
The first time I tried rock climbing was last summer. My friend invite me to an indoor climbing gym because she go there every weekend. At first I was very nervous because the wall looked so high. But the staff explained how to use the rope and after few tries I reached the top. It was hard but really exciting.
The first time I tried rock climbing was last summer. My friend invited me to an indoor climbing gym because she goes there every weekend. At first I was very nervous because the wall looked so high. But the staff explained how to use the rope and after a few tries I reached the top. It was hard but really exciting.
과거 이야기라 invited를 써요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
My friend invited me to a climbing gym.
When starting a new hobby, would you prefer a structured class or learning independently? Explain your choice and mention one disadvantage of your preferred approach.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I would prefer a structured class when I start a new hobby. the right way from the beginning, so I don't learn bad habits. Also I can meet people who . One disadvantage is classes can be expensive and the schedule is fixed, so it is not flexible.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
선호, 이유, 단점을 모두 말해 구성이 안정적이에요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I would prefer a structured class when I start a new hobby. Because a teacher can show me the right way from the beginning, so I don't learn bad habits. Also I can meet people who have same interest. One disadvantage is classes can be expensive and the schedule is fixed, so it is not flexible.
I would prefer a structured class when I start a new hobby. because a teacher can show me the right way from the beginning, so I don't learn bad habits. Also I can meet people who have the same interest. One disadvantage is classes can be expensive and the schedule is fixed, so it is not flexible.
앞 문장과 이어 하나의 문장으로 말해요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
I prefer a class because a teacher can guide me.
A university can fund many short introductory activities or a smaller number of longer courses. Its goal is to help students develop lasting interests. What should it consider when choosing between these options?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
The university should consider and how much time they have. Short activities are good to try many things, but students cannot go deep. Longer courses help students develop skills and lasting interest. I think the university should offer short activities first, and then longer courses for students who want to continue.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
두 선택지의 장단점을 비교하고 절충안을 냈어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
The university should consider what students really want and how much time they have. Short activities are good to try many things, but students cannot go deep. Longer courses help students develop skills and lasting interest. I think the university should offer short activities first, and then longer courses for students who want to continue.
The university should consider what students want and how much time they can commit and how much time they have. Short activities are good to try many things, but students cannot go deep. Longer courses help students develop skills and lasting interest. I think the university should offer short activities first, and then longer courses for students who want to continue.
두 가지 기준을 분명하게 나누면 답이 더 체계적이에요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
It should consider students’ interests and their available time.
Some people believe that adults should spend their limited free time on activities they already do well. Do you agree? Explain your opinion and acknowledge one situation in which the other view would make sense.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I don't agree with this. If adults only do what they already do well, they cannot grow and . Trying new activities can bring new friends and new energy. However, if someone is very busy and has only one free hour a week, it makes sense to do something relaxing that they already enjoy.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
반대 입장과 예외 상황을 모두 제시해 질문에 정확히 답했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I don't agree with this. If adults only do what they already do well, they cannot grow and they may get bored. Trying new activities can bring new friends and new energy. However, if someone is very busy and has only one free hour a week, it makes sense to do something relaxing that they already enjoy.
I don't agree with this. If adults only do what they already do well, they cannot grow and they may lose motivation. Trying new activities can bring new friends and new energy. However, if someone is very busy and has only one free hour a week, it makes sense to do something relaxing that they already enjoy.
조금 더 학술적인 표현이에요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
Without new challenges, adults may lose motivation.
Your student research group is featured in the university newsletter. The online article says that all 86 registered students attended your field event and that the city council funded the entire project. In fact, 68 students attended. The council paid only for transportation; the university supplied the equipment. Printed newsletters have been prepared but have not yet been distributed. The printer can replace the one page containing the article if the corrected page is approved by Thursday at noon. Today is Wednesday. To: University Newsletter Editor Write an email addressing all three points. Use complete sentences and an appropriate tone. • Explain the two factual errors and provide the correct information. • Request corrections to both the online article and the printed copies, using the available page-replacement option. • Ask for a corrected proof by Thursday at 10:00 a.m. so you
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
Dear Newsletter Editor, I am writing because there are two mistakes in the article about our research group. First, the article says all 86 students attended, but actually 68 students attended. Second, it says the city council , but the council only paid for transportation and the university supplied the equipment. Could you correct the online article and also ? Also I would like to check a corrected proof by Thursday at 10 a.m. before the printer deadline. Thank you for your help. Harin Kim
두 오류와 정정 내용을 정확히 밝히고 기한까지 요청했어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
Dear Newsletter Editor, I am writing because there are two mistakes in the article about our research group. First, the article says all 86 students attended, but actually 68 students attended. Second, it says the city council funded whole project, but the council only paid for transportation and the university supplied the equipment. Could you correct the online article and also replace the page in printed newsletters? Also I would like to check a corrected proof by Thursday at 10 a.m. before the printer deadline. Thank you for your help. Harin Kim
Dear Newsletter Editor, I am writing because there are two mistakes in the article about our research group. First, the article says all 86 students attended, but actually 68 students attended. Second, it says the city council funded the whole project, but the council only paid for transportation and the university supplied the equipment. Could you correct the online article and also replace the page in the printed newsletters? Also I would like to check a corrected proof by Thursday at 10 a.m. before the printer deadline. Thank you for your help. Harin Kim
whole 앞에는 the가 필요해요.
Dear [name], I am writing to [purpose]. First, [point 1]. Also, [point 2]. Lastly, could you [request] by [deadline]? Thank you for your time. Best regards, [name]
요구사항 3개를 순서대로 하나씩 답해요.
The council did not fund the whole project.
Professor: Some university teachers assign projects for a public audience, such as an explanation of a scientific issue for local residents or an exhibition about community history. Others believe that student work should primarily be written for the teacher, who can assess its academic quality. Should university courses include more assignments intended for a public audience? Why or why not? Tessa: Yes. When students know that people outside the classroom will see their work, they have a reason to make it useful and understandable. It also helps them practice explaining complex ideas without assuming that the audience has taken the same course. Ben: I am cautious. A public audience may prefer an attractive or entertaining presentation over a careful argument. Students might spend more time making a project impressive than investigating the topic. Work aimed at the teacher can keep the focus on academic depth. Write a post responding to the professor's question. State and support your position, and add a relevant idea or qualification in your own words. An effective response will con
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I agree with Tessa that universities should include more assignments for a public audience. When students know that real people will see their work, they try harder to . However, Ben has a good point that students may focus on looking attractive. So I think the professor should grade both the research and the presentation. For example, in my science class we made a poster for elementary students about recycling. We had to research carefully but also explain simply, and I learned more .
두 학생의 의견을 모두 다루고 채점 방식이라는 새 아이디어를 냈어요.
입장을 분명히 밝혔어요.
두 학생의 의견을 언급했어요.
이유와 예시를 들었어요.
I agree with Tessa that universities should include more assignments for a public audience. When students know that real people will see their work, they try harder to make it clear. However, Ben has a good point that students may focus on looking attractive. So I think the professor should grade both the research and the presentation. For example, in my science class we made a poster for elementary students about recycling. We had to research carefully but also explain simply, and I learned more than writing normal report.
I agree with Tessa that universities should include more assignments for a public audience. When students know that real people will see their work, they try harder to make it clear and accurate. However, Ben has a good point that students may focus on looking attractive. So I think the professor should grade both the research and the presentation. For example, in my science class we made a poster for elementary students about recycling. We had to research carefully but also explain simply, and I learned more than when I write a normal report.
대중용 과제의 핵심은 명확성과 정확성 둘 다예요.
I agree with [Name] that [position]. Admittedly, [Other] raises a valid point that [concern]. However, [my reason]. For example, [example]. Therefore, [conclusion].
두 의견을 모두 짚고 내 이유와 예시로 이어가요.
Students try to make their work clear and accurate.
인터뷰 4문항 평균 4.8 · 라이팅 2문항 평균 5.0 · 6문항 모두 아래에 펼쳐져 있어요
Thank you for taking part in our study about planning and adapting to change. Describe a time when you had to change a plan at short notice because something unexpected happened. What did you do first, and why did that step matter most?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
Last month, my study group planned to meet at a café, but . First, I sent a message to everyone in our group chat, because people were already on their way. Then I found a nearby library with free study rooms. This worked well because nobody wasted time and we still finished our project.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
무엇을 먼저 했고 왜 그랬는지 분명히 설명했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
Last month, my study group planned to meet at a café, but on that day the café was suddenly closed. First, I sent a message to everyone in our group chat, because people were already on their way. Then I found a nearby library with free study rooms. This worked well because nobody wasted time and we still finished our project.
Last month, my study group planned to meet at a café, but that day, the café was unexpectedly closed. First, I sent a message to everyone in our group chat, because people were already on their way. Then I found a nearby library with free study rooms. This worked well because nobody wasted time and we still finished our project.
이미 last month로 시점을 말했으니 간결하게 바꿔요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
That day, the café was unexpectedly closed.
When planning a group activity, do you prefer a detailed schedule or a flexible outline? Explain your preference and describe one situation in which the other approach would work better.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I prefer a flexible outline when I plan a group activity. With a flexible plan, we can change the order if something . But a detailed schedule works better for a big event like a school festival, because many people need to know exactly when and where to be.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
선호와 반대 상황(학교 축제)을 모두 제시했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I prefer a flexible outline when I plan a group activity. With a flexible plan, we can change the order if something takes longer than we expect. But a detailed schedule works better for a big event like a school festival, because many people need to know exactly when and where to be.
I prefer a flexible outline when I plan a group activity. With a flexible plan, we can change the order if something takes longer than we expected. But a detailed schedule works better for a big event like a school festival, because many people need to know exactly when and where to be.
계획 시점 기준으로 과거형이 더 자연스러워요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
Some activities take longer than we expected.
Now let's think about communication. A student organization often changes its event arrangements after people have registered. What system would you recommend to keep participants informed without overwhelming them, and why would that approach work well?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I would recommend one main channel, , for all official updates. The organization should send changes only when it is necessary and put the most important information in the first line. This way, participants always know where to check, and they don't get too many messages.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
채널 하나, 필요할 때만, 핵심 먼저라는 구체적인 시스템을 제안했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I would recommend one main channel, like a single group chat or email, for all official updates. The organization should send changes only when it is necessary and put the most important information in the first line. This way, participants always know where to check, and they don't get too many messages.
I would recommend one main channel, such as a single group chat or email, for all official updates. The organization should send changes only when it is necessary and put the most important information in the first line. This way, participants always know where to check, and they don't get too many messages.
예시를 들 때 말하기에서도 such as가 더 정확해요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
Use one channel, such as a single email list.
Some people believe that preparing a backup plan makes a group less committed to its original goal. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your view and distinguish between changing a goal and changing the way to achieve it.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I disagree with this idea. The goal can stay the same, and only the way to reach it changes. For example, if a festival is outside and it rains, moving inside still keeps the goal of having the festival. So a backup plan actually helps the group to achieve the goal.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
목표와 방법을 구분하라는 질문 요구를 정확히 충족했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I disagree with this idea. A backup plan does not mean the group gives up the goal. The goal can stay the same, and only the way to reach it changes. For example, if a festival is outside and it rains, moving inside still keeps the goal of having the festival. So a backup plan actually helps the group to achieve the goal.
I disagree with this idea. Having a backup plan does not mean the group is giving up on its goal. The goal can stay the same, and only the way to reach it changes. For example, if a festival is outside and it rains, moving inside still keeps the goal of having the festival. So a backup plan actually helps the group to achieve the goal.
give up on + 목표가 자연스러운 표현이에요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
A backup plan does not mean giving up on the goal.
Your geography class booked a 24-seat minibus for a Friday field trip. Two days before the trip, the transport office tells you that only a 16-seat minibus is available and that a second vehicle cannot be provided. There are 20 students and one instructor. The office suggests making two trips. However, everyone must arrive at the coastal site by 9:00 a.m. for a safety briefing, and the drive between campus and the site takes 45 minutes in each direction. The original departure time is 8:00 a.m. A railway station is a ten-minute walk from the site, and a train arrives there at 8:35 a.m. Six students have said they are willing to take the train if the instructor approves. To: Campus Transport Office Write an email addressing all three points. Use complete sentences and an appropriate tone. • Explain why the office's suggestion will not work. • Propose an alternative arrangement that gets e
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
Dear Campus Transport Office, I am writing about our geography field trip on Friday. Your suggestion to make two trips will not work, because the drive takes 45 minutes each way. If the first trip leaves at 8:00, the second group will arrive after 9:30, for the 9:00 safety briefing. Instead, I suggest that 15 students and the instructor take the 16-seat minibus at 8:00, and the six students who are willing take the train that arrives at 8:35. Could you confirm the minibus booking by Wednesday evening so that I can finalize the plan? Thank you, Harin Kim
제안이 왜 안 되는지 계산으로 보여 주고, 기차를 활용한 대안을 정확히 제시했어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
Dear Campus Transport Office, I am writing about our geography field trip on Friday. Your suggestion to make two trips will not work, because the drive takes 45 minutes each way. If the first trip leaves at 8:00, the second group will arrive after 9:30, which is too late for the 9:00 safety briefing. Instead, I suggest that 15 students and the instructor take the 16-seat minibus at 8:00, and the six students who are willing take the train that arrives at 8:35. Could you confirm the minibus booking by Wednesday evening so that I can finalize the plan? Thank you, Harin Kim
Dear Campus Transport Office, I am writing about our geography field trip on Friday. Your suggestion to make two trips will not work, because the drive takes 45 minutes each way. If the first trip leaves at 8:00, the second group will arrive after 9:30, which would be too late for the 9:00 safety briefing. Instead, I suggest that 15 students and the instructor take the 16-seat minibus at 8:00, and the six students who are willing take the train that arrives at 8:35. Could you confirm the minibus booking by Wednesday evening so that I can finalize the plan? Thank you, Harin Kim
가정 상황이므로 would를 써요.
Dear [name], I am writing to [purpose]. First, [point 1]. Also, [point 2]. Lastly, could you [request] by [deadline]? Thank you for your time. Best regards, [name]
요구사항 3개를 순서대로 하나씩 답해요.
The second group would arrive too late.
Professor: A university is redesigning the first year of its degree programs. One option is to let students specialize in their intended subject immediately. Another is to require a broad introductory year covering several fields before students choose a major. Which approach would better prepare students for later study, and why? Discuss the value of the learning experience, not just the number of courses required. Mina: An introductory year would help students make a more informed choice. A subject can be very different at university from what students expect, and trying several fields could reveal an interest they had never considered. Owen: Early specialization gives students time to develop the foundations needed for advanced work. In subjects where each course depends on earlier material, delaying the sequence could make later study rushed or superficial. Write a response that contributes to the discussion. Express and support your view in your own words. An effective response will contain at least 100 words.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I support Mina's idea of a broad introductory year. Many students choose a major based on what they studied in high school, but university subjects can be very different. Trying several fields can help them find a real interest. Owen is right that some subjects need a strong foundation. However, the introductory year that are useful for many majors, such as statistics or academic writing. So students would not lose time, and they could make a more informed decision about their future.
Mina를 지지하면서 Owen의 우려를 해결하는 절충안을 냈어요.
입장을 분명히 밝혔어요.
두 학생의 의견을 언급했어요.
이유와 예시를 들었어요.
I support Mina's idea of a broad introductory year. Many students choose a major based on what they studied in high school, but university subjects can be very different. Trying several fields can help them find a real interest. Owen is right that some subjects need a strong foundation. However, the introductory year can include basic courses that are useful for many majors, such as statistics or academic writing. So students would not lose time, and they could make a more informed decision about their future.
I support Mina's idea of a broad introductory year. Many students choose a major based on what they studied in high school, but university subjects can be very different. Trying several fields can help them find a real interest. Owen is right that some subjects need a strong foundation. However, the introductory year could include foundational courses that are useful for many majors, such as statistics or academic writing. So students would not lose time, and they could make a more informed decision about their future.
foundational이 대학 맥락에 더 잘 맞아요.
I agree with [Name] that [position]. Admittedly, [Other] raises a valid point that [concern]. However, [my reason]. For example, [example]. Therefore, [conclusion].
두 의견을 모두 짚고 내 이유와 예시로 이어가요.
The first year could include foundational courses.
인터뷰 4문항 평균 4.8 · 라이팅 2문항 평균 4.8 · 6문항 모두 아래에 펼쳐져 있어요
Think about a time when you worked with other people on a shared task, such as a class project or a volunteer event. Describe the task and the responsibility you had, and explain how your role helped the group succeed.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
Last semester, I worked with three classmates on a presentation about climate change. and make the charts. Because I organized the numbers clearly, the other members could explain the main points easily. Our teacher said the charts made the presentation much easier to follow, so I think my role helped the group succeed.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
과제, 역할, 기여를 순서대로 분명히 말했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
Last semester, I worked with three classmates on a presentation about climate change. My role was to collect data and make the charts. Because I organized the numbers clearly, the other members could explain the main points easily. Our teacher said the charts made the presentation much easier to follow, so I think my role helped the group succeed.
Last semester, I worked with three classmates on a presentation about climate change. I was responsible for collecting the data and make the charts. Because I organized the numbers clearly, the other members could explain the main points easily. Our teacher said the charts made the presentation much easier to follow, so I think my role helped the group succeed.
responsible for가 역할을 더 분명히 보여 줘요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
I was responsible for collecting the data.
When a group divides its work, is it better for each person to use an existing strength or to try an unfamiliar role? Explain your preference.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I think it is better to use an existing strength when the deadline is close, because the group needs good results quickly. But when there is enough time, trying an unfamiliar role is valuable because students can learn new skills. for important projects.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
상황별 장단점은 좋지만 선호가 조금 흐려졌어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I think it is better to use an existing strength when the deadline is close, because the group needs good results quickly. But when there is enough time, trying an unfamiliar role is valuable because students can learn new skills. So my preference depends on the situation, but usually I choose strengths for important projects.
I think it is better to use an existing strength when the deadline is close, because the group needs good results quickly. But when there is enough time, trying an unfamiliar role is valuable because students can learn new skills. Overall, I prefer using strengths for important projects for important projects.
질문은 선호를 묻기 때문에 마지막에 한쪽을 분명히 골라요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
Overall, I prefer using existing strengths.
Imagine your group has an important deadline the next day, and one member tells you they cannot finish their part. How would you handle the situation, and why would that be the best response?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
First, I would ask the member which part is unfinished and why. Then I would divide the remaining work among the other members based on who has time. I think this is the best response because , and our goal is to submit a complete project on time.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
첫 행동과 이유, 최종 목표까지 논리적으로 연결했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
First, I would ask the member which part is unfinished and why. Then I would divide the remaining work among the other members based on who has time. I think this is the best response because blaming the person does not solve the problem, and our goal is to submit a complete project on time.
First, I would ask the member which part is unfinished and why. Then I would divide the remaining work among the other members based on who has time. I think this is the best response because blaming the member would not solve the problem, and our goal is to submit a complete project on time.
가정 상황이라 would가 자연스러워요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
Blaming the member would not solve anything.
In many courses, students complete projects in teams. Some instructors give the group one shared grade, while others also assess each member's individual contribution. Which system do you think helps students learn more effectively, and why?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I think a system that also assesses individual contribution helps students learn more. With only one shared grade, some students may rely on others and . If teachers check each member's part, everyone has a reason to participate. However, it can be difficult for teachers to see who did what, so students could submit a short log of their work.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
입장, 이유, 한계, 해결책(작업 기록)까지 갖춘 좋은 답이에요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I think a system that also assesses individual contribution helps students learn more. With only one shared grade, some students may rely on others and do very little. If teachers check each member's part, everyone has a reason to participate. However, it can be difficult for teachers to see who did what, so students could submit a short log of their work.
I think a system that also assesses individual contribution helps students learn more. With only one shared grade, some students may rely on others and contribute very little. If teachers check each member's part, everyone has a reason to participate. However, it can be difficult for teachers to see who did what, so students could submit a short log of their work.
contribute가 팀 과제 맥락에 더 정확해요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
Some members may contribute very little.
You are a student volunteer helping with an audio-guided campus tour for twelve visitors. You reserved twelve portable audio receivers, but the equipment office has now told you that only eight will be available. The tour is tomorrow morning. Some visitors need the receivers to hear the guide clearly, and you do not know which visitors will need them. You decide to write to the tour coordinator, Ms. Alvarez. To: Ms. Alvarez Write an email addressing all three points. Use complete sentences and an appropriate tone. • Explain the equipment problem and why it needs attention before the tour. • Propose a practical arrangement that can accommodate all twelve visitors without assuming that sharing a receiver will work for everyone. • Ask for a specific decision or assistance so you can prepare in time.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
Dear Ms. Alvarez, I am writing because there is a problem with the audio receivers for tomorrow's tour. I reserved twelve receivers, but the equipment office told me that only eight will be available. Since some visitors need receivers to hear the guide clearly, we need to solve this before the tour. I suggest that we ask visitors at the start who needs a receiver and give those people priority. For the others, the guide could . Could you ask the office whether four more receivers can be borrowed from another department by this evening? Best regards, Harin Kim
문제와 요청은 분명해요. 제안이 모든 방문객을 실제로 지원하는지 한 번 더 확인해요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
Dear Ms. Alvarez, I am writing because there is a problem with the audio receivers for tomorrow's tour. I reserved twelve receivers, but the equipment office told me that only eight will be available. Since some visitors need receivers to hear the guide clearly, we need to solve this before the tour. I suggest that we ask visitors at the start who needs a receiver and give those people priority. For the others, the guide could walk slowly and stop at each location to speak loudly. Could you ask the office whether four more receivers can be borrowed from another department by this evening? Best regards, Harin Kim
Dear Ms. Alvarez, I am writing because there is a problem with the audio receivers for tomorrow's tour. I reserved twelve receivers, but the equipment office told me that only eight will be available. Since some visitors need receivers to hear the guide clearly, we need to solve this before the tour. I suggest that we ask visitors at the start who needs a receiver and give those people priority. For the others, the guide could stop at each location and repeat key information clearly. Could you ask the office whether four more receivers can be borrowed from another department by this evening? Best regards, Harin Kim
"크게 말하기"는 청각이 불편한 방문객에게 충분하지 않을 수 있어요.
Dear [name], I am writing to [purpose]. First, [point 1]. Also, [point 2]. Lastly, could you [request] by [deadline]? Thank you for your time. Best regards, [name]
요구사항 3개를 순서대로 하나씩 답해요.
The guide could repeat key information clearly at each stop.
Professor: In our course on public learning, we are discussing how museums should introduce complex topics to visitors who may spend only a few minutes in each gallery. Some museums open an exhibit with a striking object or a personal story and explain the broader context afterward. Others begin with a concise overview so visitors know how the individual examples fit together from the start. Which approach should a museum generally use, and why? Nora: I would start with an object or a personal story. Many visitors walk past a large block of background text, but one memorable example can make them curious enough to stay. For instance, seeing one immigrant family's suitcase or hearing one scientist's recorded diary can create an emotional connection quickly. The risk is that some visitors may focus too much on that one case, but later labels can widen the picture. Mateo: I prefer an overview first. Without a framework, visitors may remember a dramatic example but misunderstand how typical it is or why it matters. A short introduction, timeline, or map can give them key ideas before the
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I agree with Nora that a museum should start with a striking object or a personal story. Visitors who spend only a few minutes in each gallery usually skip long text. A memorable object makes them curious and helps them remember the topic. However, Mateo is right that visitors may misunderstand one example. To solve this, the museum can put a short sentence next to the object explaining how typical it is. For example, that thousands of families made a similar journey. In this way, the exhibit is both engaging and accurate.
Nora를 지지하고 Mateo의 우려를 라벨로 해결했어요. 구체적인 예시가 좋아요.
입장을 분명히 밝혔어요.
두 학생의 의견을 언급했어요.
이유와 예시를 들었어요.
I agree with Nora that a museum should start with a striking object or a personal story. Visitors who spend only a few minutes in each gallery usually skip long text. A memorable object makes them curious and helps them remember the topic. However, Mateo is right that visitors may misunderstand one example. To solve this, the museum can put a short sentence next to the object explaining how typical it is. For example, a suitcase could have a label saying that thousands of families made a similar journey. In this way, the exhibit is both engaging and accurate.
I agree with Nora that a museum should start with a striking object or a personal story. Visitors who spend only a few minutes in each gallery usually skip long text. A memorable object makes them curious and helps them remember the topic. However, Mateo is right that visitors may misunderstand one example. To solve this, the museum can put a short sentence next to the object explaining how typical it is. For example, a suitcase could be displayed with a label explaining that thousands of families made a similar journey. In this way, the exhibit is both engaging and accurate.
display + label explaining이 전시 맥락에 맞아요.
I agree with [Name] that [position]. Admittedly, [Other] raises a valid point that [concern]. However, [my reason]. For example, [example]. Therefore, [conclusion].
두 의견을 모두 짚고 내 이유와 예시로 이어가요.
The suitcase could be displayed with a label explaining its context.
인터뷰 4문항 평균 5.0 · 라이팅 2문항 평균 5.0 · 6문항 모두 아래에 펼쳐져 있어요
Think about a day when you felt especially energetic from the moment you woke up. Before that day, what was your evening routine like, and which part of it do you think made the biggest difference the next morning?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I remember a day before my midterm when I felt very energetic in the morning. The night before, I turned off my phone at ten and . I think putting the phone away made the biggest difference, because I fell asleep quickly and slept deeply, so I woke up refreshed.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
저녁 루틴과 가장 큰 차이를 만든 요소를 분명히 말했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I remember a day before my midterm when I felt very energetic in the morning. The night before, I turned off my phone at ten and read a novel instead of watching videos. I think putting the phone away made the biggest difference, because I fell asleep quickly and slept deeply, so I woke up refreshed.
I remember a day before my midterm when I felt very energetic in the morning. The night before, I turned off my phone at ten and read a novel instead of watching videos. I think putting the phone away made the biggest difference, because I fell asleep quickly and slept deeply, so I woke up refreshed.
더 구체적인 평가 표현이에요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
I read instead of scrolling through my phone.
When your schedule gets unusually busy with classes, work, or other responsibilities, what helps you keep a regular sleep routine, and why does that strategy work well for you?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
When my schedule is busy, I try to go to bed at the same time every night, . I finish the most important tasks first and leave easier ones for the morning. This works well for me because a regular bedtime keeps my energy stable during the week.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
전략과 그 전략이 잘 맞는 이유를 정확히 설명했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
When my schedule is busy, I try to go to bed at the same time every night, even if I have homework left. I finish the most important tasks first and leave easier ones for the morning. This works well for me because a regular bedtime keeps my energy stable during the week.
When my schedule is busy, I try to go to bed at the same time every night, even if I still have homework left. I finish the most important tasks first and leave easier ones for the morning. This works well for me because a regular bedtime keeps my energy stable during the week.
still을 넣으면 의미가 더 분명해요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
I go to bed on time even if I still have work left.
Some people keep the same waking time every day, while others sleep later on weekends to catch up. Which approach would suit you better in real life, and what is the main reason for your choice?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
Keeping the same waking time every day would suit me better. If I sleep late on weekends, it is hard to wake up on Monday and I feel tired all morning. , so I can concentrate better in my classes.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
선택과 주된 이유를 실제 경험(월요일 피곤함)으로 뒷받침했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
Keeping the same waking time every day would suit me better. If I sleep late on weekends, it is hard to wake up on Monday and I feel tired all morning. A consistent schedule is easier for my body, so I can concentrate better in my classes.
Keeping the same waking time every day would suit me better. If I sleep late on weekends, it is hard to wake up on Monday and I feel tired all morning. A consistent schedule helps my body adjust, so I can concentrate better in my classes.
easier for my body보다 자연스러운 표현이에요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
A consistent schedule helps my body adjust.
Universities often schedule required courses at fixed times, but students do not all have the same energy patterns. Do you think colleges should offer more morning and afternoon options, and what benefit or drawback matters most in your view?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I think colleges should offer more morning and afternoon options. Students have different energy patterns, and some learn better later in the day. The main benefit is that students can choose a time when they focus best. One drawback is that the university needs more teachers and classrooms, but .
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
장점과 단점을 모두 다루고 현실적인 절충안을 냈어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I think colleges should offer more morning and afternoon options. Students have different energy patterns, and some learn better later in the day. The main benefit is that students can choose a time when they focus best. One drawback is that the university needs more teachers and classrooms, but even a few extra sections would help many students.
I think colleges should offer more morning and afternoon options. Students have different energy patterns, and some learn better later in the day. The main benefit is that students can choose a time when they focus best. One drawback is that the university needs more teachers and classrooms, but even a few extra sections could help many students.
추측을 부드럽게 할 때 could를 써요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
A few extra sections could help many students.
You are registered for BIO 214, a required seminar that meets on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 2:00 to 3:15 p.m. The department has just announced a new laboratory session for CHEM 220, which meets on Thursdays from 2:30 to 5:00 p.m. Both courses are required for your program, and the laboratory is offered only at that time this term. You would like to explore a workable arrangement before changing your registration. Write an email to Ms. Patel, the course coordinator. In your email, do the following. • Explain the conflict and why both courses matter to you. • Describe one possible arrangement and why it could work. • Ask what approval or next step is needed before you change anything. Write as much as you can and in complete sentences. To: Ms. Patel Subject: Schedule conflict between BIO 214 and CHEM 220
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
Dear Ms. Patel, I am writing about a schedule conflict between BIO 214 and CHEM 220. BIO 214 meets on Thursdays from 2:00 to 3:15 p.m., but the new CHEM 220 laboratory starts at 2:30 p.m. on the same day. Both courses are required for my program, so I cannot drop either of them. One possible arrangement is to and submit a short summary, while attending the Tuesday seminar in person. This could work because the lab is offered only at that time. Could you let me know what approval I need before I change my registration? Thank you for your time. Harin Kim
충돌, 중요성, 해결책, 다음 단계를 모두 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
Dear Ms. Patel, I am writing about a schedule conflict between BIO 214 and CHEM 220. BIO 214 meets on Thursdays from 2:00 to 3:15 p.m., but the new CHEM 220 laboratory starts at 2:30 p.m. on the same day. Both courses are required for my program, so I cannot drop either of them. One possible arrangement is to attend the Thursday BIO 214 seminar through a recording and submit a short summary, while attending the Tuesday seminar in person. This could work because the lab is offered only at that time. Could you let me know what approval I need before I change my registration? Thank you for your time. Harin Kim
Dear Ms. Patel, I am writing about a schedule conflict between BIO 214 and CHEM 220. BIO 214 meets on Thursdays from 2:00 to 3:15 p.m., but the new CHEM 220 laboratory starts at 2:30 p.m. on the same day. Both courses are required for my program, so I cannot drop either of them. One possible arrangement is to ask whether I could watch the Thursday BIO 214 seminar recording and submit a short summary, while attending the Tuesday seminar in person. This could work because the lab is offered only at that time. Could you let me know what approval I need before I change my registration? Thank you for your time. Harin Kim
수업 방식을 바꾸는 건 승인이 필요하므로 요청 형태로 써요.
Dear [name], I am writing to [purpose]. First, [point 1]. Also, [point 2]. Lastly, could you [request] by [deadline]? Thank you for your time. Best regards, [name]
요구사항 3개를 순서대로 하나씩 답해요.
Could I watch the recording of the Thursday seminar?
Professor Liu: In our recent unit on effective learning, we compared policies that guide student behavior with policies that give students more independence. For large lecture courses, should universities require attendance at every class meeting, or should students decide for themselves when attending is worthwhile? Consider lectures, online materials, and students' outside responsibilities as you explain which policy is better. Mina: I support compulsory attendance in large lectures. When students come regularly, they hear follow-up explanations, examples, and spontaneous questions that slides often miss. In a difficult class, one extra explanation linking the lecture to homework can keep students from falling behind. The tradeoff is less flexibility, but the rule can prevent bigger problems. Elias: I would allow students to choose. Some students learn well from readings, recordings, and self-paced review, while others balance jobs, commuting, or family care. If a student misses class because of a late bus but watches the recording that night and still understands the material, req
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I support Elias's view that students should decide when attending is worthwhile, but with one condition. Many students have jobs or long commutes, and recordings allow them to learn at their own pace. However, Mina is right that live classes offer explanations that slides miss. Therefore, I think universities should not require attendance at every lecture, but , such as review classes before exams. This approach respects students' responsibilities while making sure they do not miss the most important explanations.
두 의견을 모두 인정하고 "핵심 수업만 필수"라는 새 기준을 제시했어요.
입장을 분명히 밝혔어요.
두 학생의 의견을 언급했어요.
이유와 예시를 들었어요.
I support Elias's view that students should decide when attending is worthwhile, but with one condition. Many students have jobs or long commutes, and recordings allow them to learn at their own pace. However, Mina is right that live classes offer explanations that slides miss. Therefore, I think universities should not require attendance at every lecture, but they could require attendance at key sessions, such as review classes before exams. This approach respects students' responsibilities while making sure they do not miss the most important explanations.
I support Elias's view that students should decide when attending is worthwhile, but with one condition. Many students have jobs or long commutes, and recordings allow them to learn at their own pace. However, Mina is right that live classes offer explanations that slides miss. Therefore, I think universities should not require attendance at every lecture, but they could require attendance only at key sessions, such as review classes before exams. This approach respects students' responsibilities while making sure they do not miss the most important explanations.
only를 넣어 범위를 분명히 해요.
I agree with [Name] that [position]. Admittedly, [Other] raises a valid point that [concern]. However, [my reason]. For example, [example]. Therefore, [conclusion].
두 의견을 모두 짚고 내 이유와 예시로 이어가요.
Attendance could be required only at key sessions.
인터뷰 4문항 평균 5.0 · 라이팅 2문항 평균 5.0 · 6문항 모두 아래에 펼쳐져 있어요
Think about a time when a phone notification interrupted something important you were doing, such as studying, working, or talking with someone. Please describe the situation, including what you did right after the interruption and how it affected your task.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
Last week, I was explaining a math problem to my friend when my phone buzzed with a group chat message. I checked it right away, and when I looked back, . My friend had to wait while I found my place again. After that, I turned on silent mode whenever I study with someone.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
상황과 직후의 행동, 이후 변화까지 잘 말했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
Last week, I was explaining a math problem to my friend when my phone buzzed with a group chat message. I checked it right away, and when I looked back, I had forgotten what I was going to say. My friend had to wait while I found my place again. After that, I turned on silent mode whenever I study with someone.
Last week, I was explaining a math problem to my friend when my phone buzzed with a group chat message. I checked it right away, and when I looked back, I had forgotten what I was going to say. My friend had to wait while I found my place again. After that, I turned on silent mode whenever I study with someone.
더 구체적인 평가 표현이에요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
By the time I looked up, I had forgotten my point.
When you need to concentrate for a long period, such as while studying or finishing a project, what do you usually do with your phone, and why does that method work well for you?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
When I need to concentrate for a long time, I put my phone in another room. If it is on my desk, . This method works well because I can't reach the phone easily, so I stop thinking about it and focus on my work.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
방법과 그 이유를 정확히 설명했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
When I need to concentrate for a long time, I put my phone in another room. If it is on my desk, I keep checking it even without notifications. This method works well because I can't reach the phone easily, so I stop thinking about it and focus on my work.
When I need to concentrate for a long time, I put my phone in another room. If it is on my desk, I keep checking it even when there are no notifications. This method works well because I can't reach the phone easily, so I stop thinking about it and focus on my work.
절로 풀면 더 자연스러워요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
I keep checking it even when nothing arrives.
Imagine you could choose a focus app for daily use. Would you prefer one that blocks distracting content automatically or one that only reminds you to refocus, and what is the main reason for your choice?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I would prefer an app that only reminds me to refocus. Blocking apps can be annoying when I actually need my phone to look up a word or check a schedule. A gentle reminder helps me notice when I'm distracted but still lets me decide, so .
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
선택과 주된 이유를 구체적인 상황(단어 찾기)으로 뒷받침했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I would prefer an app that only reminds me to refocus. Blocking apps can be annoying when I actually need my phone to look up a word or check a schedule. A gentle reminder helps me notice when I'm distracted but still lets me decide, so I feel more responsible for my own focus.
I would prefer an app that only reminds me to refocus. Blocking apps can be annoying when I actually need my phone to look up a word or check a schedule. A gentle reminder helps me notice when I'm distracted but still lets me decide, so I stay in control of my own focus.
in control이 의미를 더 정확히 전달해요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
A reminder lets me stay in control of my focus.
These days, many people are expected to reply to messages almost immediately at school or work. Do you think being available online all the time really improves collaboration, or can it create problems? Please explain your opinion with a clear reason.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I think being available all the time can create problems. Quick replies are useful for urgent matters, but constant messages break people's concentration, and . For example, in group projects, members who reply instantly may not have time for careful thinking. Teams should agree on times to check messages instead.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
장점과 문제를 모두 다루고 "확인 시간 정하기"라는 해결책을 냈어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I think being available all the time can create problems. Quick replies are useful for urgent matters, but constant messages break people's concentration, and the quality of work goes down. For example, in group projects, members who reply instantly may not have time for careful thinking. Teams should agree on times to check messages instead.
I think being available all the time can create problems. Quick replies are useful for urgent matters, but constant messages break people's concentration, and the quality of work can decline. For example, in group projects, members who reply instantly may not have time for careful thinking. Teams should agree on times to check messages instead.
decline이 더 격식 있는 표현이에요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
Constant interruptions can cause quality to decline.
You live in a university residence hall. The common room on your floor is often empty on weekday evenings, and several residents have suggested a low-cost activity that could help new students meet one another. You would like to propose one activity and offer to help organize a trial run this month. Write an email to Mr. Chen, the residence manager. In your email, do the following. • Describe the activity and who it would benefit. • Explain the space, time, or materials it would require. • Offer a specific contribution and ask whether a trial can be arranged. Write as much as you can and in complete sentences. To: Mr. Chen Subject: Proposal for a weekday evening activity in the common room
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
Dear Mr. Chen, I am writing to propose a weekday evening activity for the common room on our floor. I suggest a board game night every Wednesday from 7 to 9 p.m. It would especially benefit new students who want to meet people but feel shy. The activity would only need the common room, two tables, and a few board games, . I would be happy to make the posters and set up the room for the first session. Would it be possible to arrange a trial run on the last Wednesday of this month? Best regards, Harin Kim
활동, 대상, 필요한 것, 기여, 요청을 모두 담았어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
Dear Mr. Chen, I am writing to propose a weekday evening activity for the common room on our floor. I suggest a board game night every Wednesday from 7 to 9 p.m. It would especially benefit new students who want to meet people but feel shy. The activity would only need the common room, two tables, and a few board games, which residents can bring from home. I would be happy to make the posters and set up the room for the first session. Would it be possible to arrange a trial run on the last Wednesday of this month? Best regards, Harin Kim
Dear Mr. Chen, I am writing to propose a weekday evening activity for the common room on our floor. I suggest a board game night every Wednesday from 7 to 9 p.m. It would especially benefit new students who want to meet people but feel shy. The activity would only need the common room, two tables, and a few board games, which residents could bring from home. I would be happy to make the posters and set up the room for the first session. Would it be possible to arrange a trial run on the last Wednesday of this month? Best regards, Harin Kim
제안 상황이라 could가 더 부드러워요.
Dear [name], I am writing to [purpose]. First, [point 1]. Also, [point 2]. Lastly, could you [request] by [deadline]? Thank you for your time. Best regards, [name]
요구사항 3개를 순서대로 하나씩 답해요.
Residents could bring games from home.
Professor Evans: In our public-policy class, we are examining a city with limited money for local improvements. City officials say they can either expand a public-art program or use the same funds for routine infrastructure maintenance, but not both this year. Some council members argue that art strengthens community identity, while others say government should first pay for services residents use every day. How should they decide whether public art deserves funding alongside practical services? What standard should they use? Nora: I think art should still receive some funding because public spaces shape daily life in ways that are easy to overlook. A mural near a bus stop or a sculpture in a small park can make an area feel safer, encourage conversation, and attract more visitors to nearby shops. Daniel: I would give maintenance priority when essential facilities are already falling behind. If sidewalks are cracked or storm drains fail during heavy rain, people face daily inconvenience and real safety risks. Art has value, but spending on it first may feel unfair if residents are st
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I believe the city should use a clear standard: funding should first go to services that affect residents' safety. Daniel makes a strong point that cracked sidewalks and failing storm drains are real risks. However, Nora is right that public art can make neighborhoods feel safer and more welcoming. My suggestion is to combine the two goals. For example, the city could repair a damaged bus stop and invite local artists to paint a mural on it at the same time. This way, the city meets practical needs first while still supporting community identity .
분명한 기준(안전 우선)을 제시하고 두 목표를 결합하는 아이디어를 냈어요.
입장을 분명히 밝혔어요.
두 학생의 의견을 언급했어요.
이유와 예시를 들었어요.
I believe the city should use a clear standard: funding should first go to services that affect residents' safety. Daniel makes a strong point that cracked sidewalks and failing storm drains are real risks. However, Nora is right that public art can make neighborhoods feel safer and more welcoming. My suggestion is to combine the two goals. For example, the city could repair a damaged bus stop and invite local artists to paint a mural on it at the same time. This way, the city meets practical needs first while still supporting community identity at a low extra cost.
I believe the city should use a clear standard: funding should first go to services that affect residents' safety. Daniel makes a strong point that cracked sidewalks and failing storm drains are real risks. However, Nora is right that public art can make neighborhoods feel safer and more welcoming. My suggestion is to combine the two goals. For example, the city could repair a damaged bus stop and invite local artists to paint a mural on it at the same time. This way, the city meets practical needs first while still supporting community identity at little extra cost.
자연스러운 연어는 at little extra cost예요.
I agree with [Name] that [position]. Admittedly, [Other] raises a valid point that [concern]. However, [my reason]. For example, [example]. Therefore, [conclusion].
두 의견을 모두 짚고 내 이유와 예시로 이어가요.
This could be done at little extra cost.
인터뷰 4문항 평균 5.0 · 라이팅 2문항 평균 5.0 · 6문항 모두 아래에 펼쳐져 있어요
Thank you for joining our study about humor in everyday life. Think of something that made you or someone you know laugh recently. What happened, and what made the situation funny or surprising to you?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
Recently, my younger brother tried to make pancakes for our family on a Sunday morning. on top of the refrigerator. Everyone laughed because he looked so proud right before it happened. What made it funny was the surprise, since he had been telling us all week that he was a great cook.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
상황과 웃긴 이유(놀라움)를 분명히 설명했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
Recently, my younger brother tried to make pancakes for our family on a Sunday morning. He flipped the first pancake so hard that it landed on top of the refrigerator. Everyone laughed because he looked so proud right before it happened. What made it funny was the surprise, since he had been telling us all week that he was a great cook.
Recently, my younger brother tried to make pancakes for our family on a Sunday morning. He flipped the first pancake so hard that it landed on top of the refrigerator. Everyone laughed because he looked so proud right before it happened. What made it funny was the surprise, since he had been telling us all week that he was a great cook.
더 구체적인 평가 표현이에요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
He laughed so hard that he cried.
When you tell a funny story to someone who was not there, what details do you usually include so the person can picture the situation and understand why it was funny?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
When I tell a funny story, I usually include where it happened and how the people reacted. I also describe one small detail, like someone's facial expression, because it helps the listener picture the moment. before the funny part, so the surprise makes sense.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
세 가지 요소(장소, 반응, 기대)를 구체적으로 설명했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
When I tell a funny story, I usually include where it happened and how the people reacted. I also describe one small detail, like someone's facial expression, because it helps the listener picture the moment. Most importantly, I explain what everyone expected before the funny part, so the surprise makes sense.
When I tell a funny story, I usually include where it happened and how the people reacted. I also describe one small detail, like someone's facial expression, because it helps the listener picture the moment. Most importantly, I explain what everyone expected to happen before the funny part, so the surprise makes sense.
expected 뒤에 to happen을 붙이면 더 분명해요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
I explain what everyone expected to happen.
Some people laugh most at familiar everyday situations, while others prefer jokes with unusual twists. Which kind of humor do you prefer, and what about that style makes it more enjoyable for you?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I prefer humor about familiar everyday situations. When a joke is about something I have experienced, like missing the bus or forgetting my keys, I feel connected to it. Jokes with unusual twists can be clever, but sometimes I need time to understand them, so .
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
선호와 이유를 경험 예시로 분명히 말했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I prefer humor about familiar everyday situations. When a joke is about something I have experienced, like missing the bus or forgetting my keys, I feel connected to it. Jokes with unusual twists can be clever, but sometimes I need time to understand them, so everyday humor feels more natural and warm to me.
I prefer humor about familiar everyday situations. When a joke is about something I have experienced, like missing the bus or forgetting my keys, I feel connected to it. Jokes with unusual twists can be clever, but sometimes I need time to understand them, so everyday humor feels more natural and relatable to me.
relatable이 "공감 가는"의 의미를 정확히 전달해요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
Everyday humor feels more relatable.
People sometimes use humor when talking about serious or uncomfortable issues. In your opinion, can humor make those discussions more productive, or can it weaken them? Explain what conditions, such as timing or audience, matter most to your view.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I think humor can make serious discussions more productive, but only under certain conditions. A light comment can reduce tension and help people speak more openly. However, the timing must be right, and . If the audience feels respected, humor can help, but otherwise it can weaken the discussion.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
조건(타이밍, 대상)을 분명히 제시한 균형 잡힌 답이에요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I think humor can make serious discussions more productive, but only under certain conditions. A light comment can reduce tension and help people speak more openly. However, the timing must be right, and the joke should never target someone who is affected by the issue. If the audience feels respected, humor can help, but otherwise it can weaken the discussion.
I think humor can make serious discussions more productive, but only under certain conditions. A light comment can reduce tension and help people speak more openly. However, the timing must be right, and the joke should never target people who are affected by the issue. If the audience feels respected, humor can help, but otherwise it can weaken the discussion.
일반적인 사람들을 말할 때 복수형이 자연스러워요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
Jokes should never target people who are affected.
You collected a prepaid book order and later discovered that one book belongs to another customer. Your receipt lists the correct title, but the bag contains a different one. You need your book for a class later this week. To: Ms. Rivera, campus bookshop supervisor Write an email to the person identified above. In your email, address all three points below. Express your ideas clearly and use an appropriate tone. • Explain the difference between your order and what you received. • Describe when you can return the incorrect book and why timing matters. • Ask the supervisor to confirm how you can obtain the correct book.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
Dear Ms. Rivera, I am writing about a prepaid book order that I collected yesterday. My receipt lists Introduction to Cell Biology, but the bag contained a different book, Principles of Accounting, which seems to belong to another customer. I can return the incorrect book tomorrow between 10 a.m. and noon. The timing matters because I need the correct book for my biology class on Thursday, and . Could you confirm whether I can exchange it at the counter, or if I should contact someone else? Thank you for your help. Harin Kim
차이, 반납 시간과 이유, 확인 요청을 모두 정확히 담았어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
Dear Ms. Rivera, I am writing about a prepaid book order that I collected yesterday. My receipt lists Introduction to Cell Biology, but the bag contained a different book, Principles of Accounting, which seems to belong to another customer. I can return the incorrect book tomorrow between 10 a.m. and noon. The timing matters because I need the correct book for my biology class on Thursday, and the other customer probably needs theirs as well. Could you confirm whether I can exchange it at the counter, or if I should contact someone else? Thank you for your help. Harin Kim
Dear Ms. Rivera, I am writing about a prepaid book order that I collected yesterday. My receipt lists Introduction to Cell Biology, but the bag contained a different book, Principles of Accounting, which seems to belong to another customer. I can return the incorrect book tomorrow between 10 a.m. and noon. The timing matters because I need the correct book for my biology class on Thursday, and the other customer may need theirs as well. Could you confirm whether I can exchange it at the counter, or if I should contact someone else? Thank you for your help. Harin Kim
추측을 공손하게 할 때 may가 좋아요.
Dear [name], I am writing to [purpose]. First, [point 1]. Also, [point 2]. Lastly, could you [request] by [deadline]? Thank you for your time. Best regards, [name]
요구사항 3개를 순서대로 하나씩 답해요.
The other customer may need theirs as well.
Professor Santos: We are examining how businesses influence consumer choices. Should online retailers make a slower, consolidated delivery service the default while still allowing customers to request faster delivery? In your view, would this policy improve decision making, and what effects might it have on customers, companies, or the environment? Asha: I support making consolidated delivery the default because many purchases are not urgent, yet people often accept the fastest option simply because it appears first. If several orders going to the same neighborhood were grouped into one trip, the retailer could send fewer vehicles and possibly use less packaging. Customers who need a textbook, replacement charger, or medicine quickly could still choose faster shipping, but the default would encourage people to pause and decide whether speed is truly necessary. Leo: I am less convinced because a slower default might create problems for customers with unpredictable schedules. For example, someone who works long shifts or shares an apartment may need a package to arrive on a specific da
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I agree with Asha that consolidated delivery should be the default, as long as customers can easily choose faster shipping. Many people click the fastest option without thinking because it appears first, even when they don't need the item quickly. A slower default encourages them to make a more conscious decision, and it can reduce the number of delivery trips and packaging. Leo is right that some customers have unpredictable schedules, so retailers should . This combination would protect the environment while still meeting individual needs.
Asha를 지지하면서 Leo의 우려를 해결하는 구체적인 제안을 했어요.
입장을 분명히 밝혔어요.
두 학생의 의견을 언급했어요.
이유와 예시를 들었어요.
I agree with Asha that consolidated delivery should be the default, as long as customers can easily choose faster shipping. Many people click the fastest option without thinking because it appears first, even when they don't need the item quickly. A slower default encourages them to make a more conscious decision, and it can reduce the number of delivery trips and packaging. Leo is right that some customers have unpredictable schedules, so retailers should let them pick a specific delivery day for free. This combination would protect the environment while still meeting individual needs.
I agree with Asha that consolidated delivery should be the default, as long as customers can easily choose faster shipping. Many people click the fastest option without thinking because it appears first, even when they don't need the item quickly. A slower default encourages them to make a more conscious decision, and it can reduce the number of delivery trips and packaging. Leo is right that some customers have unpredictable schedules, so retailers should allow them to choose a specific delivery day at no extra cost. This combination would protect the environment while still meeting individual needs.
정중하고 정확한 표현이에요.
I agree with [Name] that [position]. Admittedly, [Other] raises a valid point that [concern]. However, [my reason]. For example, [example]. Therefore, [conclusion].
두 의견을 모두 짚고 내 이유와 예시로 이어가요.
Customers could choose a delivery day at no extra cost.
인터뷰 4문항 평균 5.1 · 라이팅 2문항 평균 5.5 · 6문항 모두 아래에 펼쳐져 있어요
Think about a time when you were working on a difficult task, such as a class project or a practical problem, and considered asking someone for help. What factors affected your decision to ask or keep working alone, and why?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
During a group project last semester, I was struggling to analyze survey data in a spreadsheet. I hesitated to ask for help because I thought my classmates were busy, and I wanted to prove I could do it myself. However, after two hours with no progress, I asked a friend who was good at statistics. She showed me one formula in five minutes, and .
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
망설인 이유와 결과, 깨달음까지 담은 성숙한 답이에요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
During a group project last semester, I was struggling to analyze survey data in a spreadsheet. I hesitated to ask for help because I thought my classmates were busy, and I wanted to prove I could do it myself. However, after two hours with no progress, I asked a friend who was good at statistics. She showed me one formula in five minutes, and I realized that waiting so long had wasted time.
During a group project last semester, I was struggling to analyze survey data in a spreadsheet. I hesitated to ask for help because I thought my classmates were busy, and I wanted to prove I could do it myself. However, after two hours with no progress, I asked a friend who was good at statistics. She showed me one formula in five minutes, and I realized that waiting so long had wasted my time.
my를 넣어 누구의 시간인지 분명히 해요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
Waiting so long had wasted my time.
Do you prefer asking one specific question or having someone guide you through an entire unfamiliar task? Explain a situation in which your preference would be useful.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I prefer asking one specific question rather than being guided through the whole task. It lets me keep control of my work and learn by doing. For example, when I was learning to edit videos, I only asked how to cut a clip, and , so I remembered the steps much better.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
선호와 그 선호가 유용한 상황을 구체적으로 말했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I prefer asking one specific question rather than being guided through the whole task. It lets me keep control of my work and learn by doing. For example, when I was learning to edit videos, I only asked how to cut a clip, and I figured out the rest by experimenting, so I remembered the steps much better.
I prefer asking one specific question rather than being guided through the whole task. It lets me keep control of my work and learn by doing. For example, when I was learning to edit videos, I only asked how to cut a clip, and I figured out the rest by experimenting, so I remembered the steps much better.
더 구체적인 평가 표현이에요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
I figured it out on my own.
Now imagine a classmate often asks you to solve homework problems before trying them alone. How would you respond in a way that is supportive but still encourages the classmate to think independently? Give a brief example.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I would tell my classmate that I am happy to help, but first I would ask them to show me what they have tried. Then, instead of giving the answer, . For example, I might say, "What formula did we use in class for this type of problem?" This way, they still think independently.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
지원하면서 독립성을 키우는 방법을 구체적인 예시 문장으로 보여 줬어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I would tell my classmate that I am happy to help, but first I would ask them to show me what they have tried. Then, instead of giving the answer, I would give a hint about the first step. For example, I might say, "What formula did we use in class for this type of problem?" This way, they still think independently.
I would tell my classmate that I am happy to help, but first I would ask them to show me what they have tried. Then, instead of giving the answer, I would give them a hint about the first step. For example, I might say, "What formula did we use in class for this type of problem?" This way, they still think independently.
누구에게 주는지 them을 넣어요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
I would give them a hint first.
Finally, in some workplaces, employees are praised for solving problems on their own. In your opinion, when can that kind of culture make people hesitate to ask for needed help, and what effects could that have on the team?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
A culture that praises solving problems alone can make people afraid to look incompetent, especially new employees. As a result, they may spend too long on a problem or make mistakes that a colleague could have prevented quickly. Over time, the team becomes slower and less creative, because knowledge is not shared. .
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
원인, 결과, 해결책까지 연결된 높은 수준의 답이에요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
A culture that praises solving problems alone can make people afraid to look incompetent, especially new employees. As a result, they may spend too long on a problem or make mistakes that a colleague could have prevented quickly. Over time, the team becomes slower and less creative, because knowledge is not shared. Teams should praise asking good questions as well.
A culture that praises solving problems alone can make people afraid to look incompetent, especially new employees. As a result, they may spend too long on a problem or make mistakes that a colleague could have prevented quickly. Over time, the team becomes slower and less creative, because knowledge is not shared. Teams should also praise people for asking good questions.
praise + 사람 + for -ing가 자연스러워요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
Teams should praise people for asking good questions.
You are helping run a materials demonstration for twenty visitors. Its explanation is printed on four panels beside a moving exhibit. During a trial, people could read the panels only by standing where they blocked the narrow accessible route. The exhibit cannot be moved before Saturday. A nearby side table can hold duplicate panels, but people there cannot see the moving parts. Two volunteers are available, and the presentation must remain within twelve minutes. To: Dr. Imani, demonstration coordinator Write an email that addresses all three points. Use complete sentences and an appropriate tone. • Explain why simply asking visitors to read faster would not address the problem. • Propose a workable sequence using the side table and both volunteers while keeping the accessible route clear. • Ask for approval of a specific arrangement and identify something to check in a short trial befor
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
. Imani, I am writing about the reading panels for the materials demonstration. Asking visitors to read faster would not solve the problem, because the issue is where they stand, not how quickly they read; anyone reading the panels still blocks the narrow accessible route. I propose that one volunteer place duplicate panels on the side table and briefly explain them before visitors approach the exhibit, while the second volunteer guides small groups past the moving parts. This sequence keeps the route clear and fits within twelve minutes. Could you approve this arrangement? In a short trial before Saturday, we could check whether the timing works with groups of five. Best regards, Harin Kim
문제의 본질(위치)을 정확히 짚고 실행 가능한 순서와 확인 항목을 제시했어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
Dear Dr. Imani, I am writing about the reading panels for the materials demonstration. Asking visitors to read faster would not solve the problem, because the issue is where they stand, not how quickly they read; anyone reading the panels still blocks the narrow accessible route. I propose that one volunteer place duplicate panels on the side table and briefly explain them before visitors approach the exhibit, while the second volunteer guides small groups past the moving parts. This sequence keeps the route clear and fits within twelve minutes. Could you approve this arrangement? In a short trial before Saturday, we could check whether the timing works with groups of five. Best regards, Harin Kim
Dear Dr. Imani, I am writing about the reading panels for the materials demonstration. Asking visitors to read faster would not solve the problem, because the issue is where they stand, not how quickly they read; anyone reading the panels still blocks the narrow accessible route. I propose that one volunteer place duplicate panels on the side table and briefly explain them before visitors approach the exhibit, while the second volunteer guides small groups past the moving parts. This sequence keeps the route clear and fits within twelve minutes. Could you approve this arrangement? In a short trial before Saturday, we could check whether the timing works with groups of five. Best regards, Harin Kim
더 구체적인 평가 표현이에요.
Dear [name], I am writing to [purpose]. First, [point 1]. Also, [point 2]. Lastly, could you [request] by [deadline]? Thank you for your time. Best regards, [name]
요구사항 3개를 순서대로 하나씩 답해요.
Dear Dr.
Professor: University research groups sometimes consider releasing a public explanation of preliminary findings before the full analysis is finished. Early sharing can invite useful questions from people outside the project, but it can also spread claims that later change after more evidence is checked. For example, a campus transportation study might report an initial increase in bicycle use after new lanes are added, then later discover that a week of unusually mild weather partly caused the rise. Should university research groups routinely share preliminary findings with the public, or wait until the analysis is complete? Explain how your approach would address both usefulness and uncertainty. Maya: I favor early sharing when the limits are stated clearly. People outside a project sometimes notice practical implications or missing variables that the researchers did not consider. If local transit staff or student cyclists point out a scheduling change that affected the results, the research team can improve the next stage of the study. Noah: I would usually wait. Once an early clai
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I believe research groups should share preliminary findings only when they clearly explain the limitations. Maya is right that outsiders can notice factors researchers missed, such as a change in bus schedules. However, Noah makes an important point that warnings often disappear when claims spread online. Therefore, I suggest sharing early results through channels the researchers control, like a project webpage, where every finding is labeled with how certain it is and what might change it. In the bicycle example, the team could state that the weather data has not been checked yet. This approach keeps the benefits of feedback while .
두 의견을 인정하고 "통제 가능한 채널 + 확실성 표시"라는 새 해결책을 냈어요.
입장을 분명히 밝혔어요.
두 학생의 의견을 언급했어요.
이유와 예시를 들었어요.
I believe research groups should share preliminary findings only when they clearly explain the limitations. Maya is right that outsiders can notice factors researchers missed, such as a change in bus schedules. However, Noah makes an important point that warnings often disappear when claims spread online. Therefore, I suggest sharing early results through channels the researchers control, like a project webpage, where every finding is labeled with how certain it is and what might change it. In the bicycle example, the team could state that the weather data has not been checked yet. This approach keeps the benefits of feedback while reducing misleading headlines.
I believe research groups should share preliminary findings only when they clearly explain the limitations. Maya is right that outsiders can notice factors researchers missed, such as a change in bus schedules. However, Noah makes an important point that warnings often disappear when claims spread online. Therefore, I suggest sharing early results through channels the researchers control, like a project webpage, where every finding is labeled with how certain it is and what might change it. In the bicycle example, the team could state that the weather data has not been checked yet. This approach keeps the benefits of feedback while reducing the risk of misleading headlines.
risk of를 넣으면 주장이 더 정확해요.
I agree with [Name] that [position]. Admittedly, [Other] raises a valid point that [concern]. However, [my reason]. For example, [example]. Therefore, [conclusion].
두 의견을 모두 짚고 내 이유와 예시로 이어가요.
This reduces the risk of misleading headlines.
인터뷰 4문항 평균 5.4 · 라이팅 2문항 평균 5.5 · 6문항 모두 아래에 펼쳐져 있어요
I'd like to start with a personal example. Tell me about a name or title that caught your attention when you saw a club, event, or project being advertised. What about that wording interested you, and what did you expect from it?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
Last year I noticed a poster for a club called "Night Owls Book Society." The name caught my attention because it sounded playful and a little mysterious. I expected a relaxed group that met in the evening to talk about novels, and that was exactly what it was, .
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
이름이 끈 이유와 기대, 실제 경험까지 연결했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
Last year I noticed a poster for a club called "Night Owls Book Society." The name caught my attention because it sounded playful and a little mysterious. I expected a relaxed group that met in the evening to talk about novels, and that was exactly what it was, so the name gave me an accurate impression.
Last year I noticed a poster for a club called "Night Owls Book Society." The name caught my attention because it sounded playful and a little mysterious. I expected a relaxed group that met in the evening to talk about novels, and that was exactly what it was, so the name gave me an accurate first impression.
first impression이 자연스러운 연어예요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
The name gave me an accurate first impression.
When you are naming a student project for a broad audience, would you prefer a direct descriptive title or a more unusual, memorable one? Briefly explain the main tradeoff behind your choice.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
For a broad audience, I would choose a direct descriptive title. An unusual title may be memorable, but people might not understand what the project is about and skip it. The main tradeoff is that a descriptive title is clear but less eye-catching, to keep it interesting.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
선택, 핵심 트레이드오프, 해결책까지 모두 담았어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
For a broad audience, I would choose a direct descriptive title. An unusual title may be memorable, but people might not understand what the project is about and skip it. The main tradeoff is that a descriptive title is clear but less eye-catching, so I would add a short creative subtitle to keep it interesting.
For a broad audience, I would choose a direct descriptive title. An unusual title may be memorable, but people might not understand what the project is about and skip it. The main tradeoff is that a descriptive title is clear but less eye-catching, so I would add a short, creative subtitle to keep it interesting.
형용사 두 개 사이에 쉼표가 필요해요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
I would add a short, creative subtitle.
Now imagine a campus club has a name that makes new students assume it is only for experienced members, even though beginners are welcome. What change would you make first to solve that problem, and why?
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
The first change I would make is to add a short line to the club's posters and website, such as "Beginners welcome — no experience needed." Changing the whole name takes time and may confuse current members, but a clear message solves the main problem immediately and .
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
우선순위(이름보다 문구)를 분명히 하고 이유를 설명했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
The first change I would make is to add a short line to the club's posters and website, such as "Beginners welcome — no experience needed." Changing the whole name takes time and may confuse current members, but a clear message solves the main problem immediately and shows new students that they belong.
The first change I would make is to add a short line to the club's posters and website, such as "Beginners welcome — no experience needed." Changing the whole name takes time and may confuse current members, but a clear message solves the main problem immediately and shows new students that they are welcome.
"환영받는다"가 문맥에 더 정확해요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
It shows new students that they are welcome.
More generally, do you think changing the name of an organization can significantly change how people view it if its activities and goals stay the same? Please explain your position and give one reason for it.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I think changing a name can affect first impressions, but it cannot significantly change how people view an organization over time. People eventually judge a group by its activities and the experiences they have with it. For example, if a club changes its name but still ignores new members, .
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
단기·장기 효과를 구분한 성숙한 답이에요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I think changing a name can affect first impressions, but it cannot significantly change how people view an organization over time. People eventually judge a group by its activities and the experiences they have with it. For example, if a club changes its name but still ignores new members, students will soon feel the same way about it.
I think changing a name can affect first impressions, but it cannot significantly change how people view an organization over time. People eventually judge a group by its activities and the experiences they have with it. For example, if a club changes its name but still ignores new members, students will soon feel the same way about the club.
대명사 대신 명사를 쓰면 더 분명해요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
Students will soon feel the same way about the club.
You are checking a student exhibition catalogue. A draft biography attributes a group-designed installation entirely to one student because that student's name appears on the loan form. The project log lists four designers but does not specify their individual contributions. The catalogue goes to print on Friday. You can contact the group on Wednesday, and the editor can leave the design credit open until Thursday afternoon. No designer has yet approved the current wording. To: Ms. Sato, exhibition editor Write an email that addresses all three points. Use complete sentences and an appropriate tone. • Explain why the loan form is insufficient evidence for the current design credit. • Propose wording or a verification process that acknowledges the available evidence without inventing individual contributions. • Request a specific action and deadline that will allow a correction before pri
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
Dear Ms. Sato, I am writing about the design credit in the draft catalogue biography. The loan form is not sufficient evidence, because it only shows who borrowed the materials, not who designed the installation, and the project log lists four designers. I suggest temporarily crediting the work to "the design team" and listing all four names, without describing individual contributions. On Wednesday, I will contact the group to ask each designer to approve the wording. Could you please keep the design credit open so that we can send the approved text before printing? Best regards, Harin Kim
증거 부족 이유, 임시 문구, 확인 절차, 구체적인 요청과 기한을 모두 담았어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
Dear Ms. Sato, I am writing about the design credit in the draft catalogue biography. The loan form is not sufficient evidence, because it only shows who borrowed the materials, not who designed the installation, and the project log lists four designers. I suggest temporarily crediting the work to "the design team" and listing all four names, without describing individual contributions. On Wednesday, I will contact the group to ask each designer to approve the wording. Could you please keep the design credit open until Thursday at 3 p.m. so that we can send the approved text before printing? Best regards, Harin Kim
Dear Ms. Sato, I am writing about the design credit in the draft catalogue biography. The loan form is not sufficient evidence, because it only shows who borrowed the materials, not who designed the installation, and the project log lists four designers. I suggest temporarily crediting the work to "the design team" and listing all four names, without describing individual contributions. On Wednesday, I will contact the group to ask each designer to approve the wording. Could you please keep the design credit open until Thursday at 3 p.m., after which we will send the approved text so that we can send the approved text before printing? Best regards, Harin Kim
기한 이후 무엇을 할지 명시하면 더 완전해요.
Dear [name], I am writing to [purpose]. First, [point 1]. Also, [point 2]. Lastly, could you [request] by [deadline]? Thank you for your time. Best regards, [name]
요구사항 3개를 순서대로 하나씩 답해요.
Please keep the credit open until Thursday at 3 p.m.
Professor: A university is considering a system that lets students send anonymous questions during lectures on their phones or laptops. The instructor would choose a few to answer publicly during class or at the end. Should this become the normal way of collecting questions, or should named, spoken questions remain the main method? Consider both participation and responsibility for keeping discussion useful. Maya: I support anonymous questions as the main channel in large classes. Some students understand most of the lecture but hesitate to admit confusion in front of everyone. If they can send a question privately, the instructor can still clarify that point for the whole class. The instructor can ignore vague or repeated messages. Noah: I still prefer named, spoken questions as the main method. When a student asks aloud, the instructor can ask a follow-up question right away and find out what the student really means. That exchange can help other students refine their thinking. Anonymous messages may increase participation, but they can reduce accountability. Contribute to the disc
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I support using anonymous questions as an additional channel rather than the main method. Maya is right that many students hesitate to admit confusion in a large lecture, so anonymity can reveal common misunderstandings. However, Noah's point about follow-up questions is important, because a short message often does not show exactly what the student means. A balanced approach would be to collect anonymous questions during the lecture and to explain their confusion in more detail. This way, shy students can participate, and the discussion still benefits from real dialogue.
두 의견을 결합한 구체적인 절차를 제안했어요.
입장을 분명히 밝혔어요.
두 학생의 의견을 언급했어요.
이유와 예시를 들었어요.
I support using anonymous questions as an additional channel rather than the main method. Maya is right that many students hesitate to admit confusion in a large lecture, so anonymity can reveal common misunderstandings. However, Noah's point about follow-up questions is important, because a short message often does not show exactly what the student means. A balanced approach would be to collect anonymous questions during the lecture and then let the instructor invite volunteers to explain their confusion in more detail. This way, shy students can participate, and the discussion still benefits from real dialogue.
I support using anonymous questions as an additional channel rather than the main method. Maya is right that many students hesitate to admit confusion in a large lecture, so anonymity can reveal common misunderstandings. However, Noah's point about follow-up questions is important, because a short message often does not show exactly what the student means. A balanced approach would be to collect anonymous questions during the lecture and then have the instructor invite volunteers to explain their confusion in more detail. This way, shy students can participate, and the discussion still benefits from real dialogue.
have + 사람 + 동사원형이 더 자연스러워요.
I agree with [Name] that [position]. Admittedly, [Other] raises a valid point that [concern]. However, [my reason]. For example, [example]. Therefore, [conclusion].
두 의견을 모두 짚고 내 이유와 예시로 이어가요.
Then the instructor could invite volunteers to explain.
인터뷰 4문항 평균 5.5 · 라이팅 2문항 평균 5.8 · 6문항 모두 아래에 펼쳐져 있어요
Think about a time when you were learning to do something new, such as using a device or following a process. Tell me about a demonstration that helped you understand it better, and explain what specific part became clearer after you watched it.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
When I started using a sewing machine in a design class, I kept breaking the thread. My teacher demonstrated the threading process slowly, . Seeing that one step up close made everything clear, and after that I could thread the machine correctly on my own.
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
도움이 된 시연과 명확해진 부분을 구체적으로 설명했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
When I started using a sewing machine in a design class, I kept breaking the thread. My teacher demonstrated the threading process slowly, pointing out a small guide hook that I had always skipped. Seeing that one step up close made everything clear, and after that I could thread the machine correctly on my own.
When I started using a sewing machine in a design class, I kept breaking the thread. My teacher demonstrated the threading process slowly, pointing out a small guide hook that I had always skipped. Seeing that one step up close made everything clear, and after that I could thread the machine correctly on my own.
더 구체적인 평가 표현이에요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
She pointed out a step I had always missed.
When you need to learn a new skill from a demonstration, would you rather watch the whole thing first or stop after each step and try it yourself? Briefly explain why that approach works better for you.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I would rather stop after each step and try it myself. When I watch the whole demonstration first, I often forget the early steps by the end. Practicing immediately lets me notice my mistakes while the instructions are still fresh, .
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
선호와 이유를 자신의 학습 습관으로 설득력 있게 설명했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I would rather stop after each step and try it myself. When I watch the whole demonstration first, I often forget the early steps by the end. Practicing immediately lets me notice my mistakes while the instructions are still fresh, so the skill stays with me much longer.
I would rather stop after each step and try it myself. When I watch the whole demonstration first, I often forget the early steps by the end. Practicing immediately lets me notice my mistakes while the instructions are still fresh, so I retain the skill much longer.
retain이 학습 맥락에 더 정확해요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
I retain new skills longer when I practice.
Imagine a presenter shows that a method works but cannot clearly explain the reason behind it. How useful would that demonstration be to you? Give one reason for your answer, such as whether you would trust the result.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
A demonstration like that would be only partly useful to me. It shows that the method works in one situation, but without an explanation, I would not know when it might fail. So I would trust the result less and .
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
유용성과 신뢰 문제를 논리적으로 연결했어요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
A demonstration like that would be only partly useful to me. It shows that the method works in one situation, but without an explanation, I would not know when it might fail. So I would trust the result less and hesitate to use the method in a different context.
A demonstration like that would be only partly useful to me. It shows that the method works in one situation, but without an explanation, I would not know when it might fail. So I would trust the result less and hesitate to apply the method in a different context.
apply가 방법에 더 잘 어울려요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
I would hesitate to apply it elsewhere.
Some people say a strong demonstration can make a weak explanation seem more convincing than it really is, especially when viewers do not have time to examine the details. Do you agree or disagree? Support your opinion with one example.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I agree that a strong demonstration can make a weak explanation seem more convincing. Visual results feel like proof, so viewers may stop questioning the reasoning behind them. For example, a product video might show a cleaner removing one stain perfectly without explaining whether it works on other materials. When people have little time, .
음성인식 텍스트의 내용·표현을 평가했어요. 발음·억양은 수업에서 확인해요.
입장, 이유, 예시, 조언까지 완성도 높은 답이에요.
첫 문장에서 질문에 바로 답했어요.
자신의 경험으로 이유를 뒷받침했어요.
I agree that a strong demonstration can make a weak explanation seem more convincing. Visual results feel like proof, so viewers may stop questioning the reasoning behind them. For example, a product video might show a cleaner removing one stain perfectly without explaining whether it works on other materials. When people have little time, they should look for evidence beyond the demonstration.
I agree that a strong demonstration can make a weak explanation seem more convincing. Visual results feel like proof, so viewers may stop questioning the reasoning behind them. For example, a product video might show a cleaner removing one stain perfectly without explaining whether it works on other materials. When people have little time, viewers should look for evidence beyond the demonstration.
주어를 분명히 해요.
[Answer]. The main reason is that [reason]. For example, [experience]. So [wrap-up].
답 → 이유 → 예시 → 마무리 순서로 45초를 채워요.
Viewers should look for evidence beyond the demo.
You borrowed a practice instrument from a university collection. A key now sticks, although the checkout record says that all keys moved freely. A local technician can inspect it today, but repairs require the collection's written approval. Your assessment is in three days, and a replacement instrument is available only if returned equipment is checked in by tomorrow morning. Write to the coordinator. To: the instrument loan coordinator Write an email that addresses all three points. Use complete sentences and an appropriate tone. • Describe the problem without claiming to know its cause. • Ask which authorized inspection or replacement option can meet your deadline. • Propose a practical time to return the instrument and request confirmation.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
Dear Instrument Loan Coordinator, I am writing about the practice instrument I borrowed from the collection. One key now sticks when it is pressed, although the checkout record states that all keys moved freely. I do not know what caused the problem. Since my assessment is in three days, could you tell me which authorized option would meet my deadline: an inspection by the local technician today with your written approval, or a replacement instrument? If a replacement is better, I can return the instrument tomorrow at 8:30 a.m. . Could you please confirm this time? Thank you for your help. Harin Kim
원인을 단정하지 않고 문제를 설명하며, 두 선택지와 반납 시간을 정확히 제시했어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
요구사항을 이메일에서 다뤘어요.
Dear Instrument Loan Coordinator, I am writing about the practice instrument I borrowed from the collection. One key now sticks when it is pressed, although the checkout record states that all keys moved freely. I do not know what caused the problem. Since my assessment is in three days, could you tell me which authorized option would meet my deadline: an inspection by the local technician today with your written approval, or a replacement instrument? If a replacement is better, I can return the instrument tomorrow at 8:30 a.m. so that it is checked in before the morning deadline. Could you please confirm this time? Thank you for your help. Harin Kim
Dear Instrument Loan Coordinator, I am writing about the practice instrument I borrowed from the collection. One key now sticks when it is pressed, although the checkout record states that all keys moved freely. I do not know what caused the problem. Since my assessment is in three days, could you tell me which authorized option would meet my deadline: an inspection by the local technician today with your written approval, or a replacement instrument? If a replacement is better, I can return the instrument tomorrow at 8:30 a.m. so that it can be checked in before the morning deadline. Could you please confirm this time? Thank you for your help. Harin Kim
가능을 나타내는 can be가 더 정확해요.
Dear [name], I am writing to [purpose]. First, [point 1]. Also, [point 2]. Lastly, could you [request] by [deadline]? Thank you for your time. Best regards, [name]
요구사항 3개를 순서대로 하나씩 답해요.
It can be checked in before the deadline.
Professor: A city has funding for one new public artwork. It can let residents choose from a shortlist or allow a panel of artists and curators to make the final decision. Public voting may strengthen local involvement, while expert selection may recognize work whose value is not immediately obvious. Who should make the final choice, and what should the other group contribute? Maya: Residents should choose because they will encounter the work every day. Experts can prepare a shortlist that meets practical requirements, but the final vote would give the community a meaningful role rather than merely asking for opinions that can be ignored. Noah: I would give the expert panel the final decision. An unfamiliar work may become valued over time even if it is not initially popular. Residents should still identify concerns about the site and explain what the space means to them. Contribute to the discussion in your own words. State and support your position, adding a reason, example, or qualification. An effective response contains at least 100 words.
표시된 표현을 누르면, 왜 고쳐야 하는지 확인할 수 있어요.
I believe the expert panel should make the final decision, but residents should shape the shortlist and the requirements. Noah is right that valuable artwork is not always popular at first; before people grew to love them. However, Maya makes a fair point that residents will see the work every day, so their experience of the site matters. A practical approach would be to hold community workshops where residents explain how they use the space and what they hope it will express, and then the panel would choose the work that best responds to those needs. This gives residents real influence without limiting artistic quality.
질문의 두 부분(누가 결정, 다른 그룹의 역할)에 모두 답하고 구체적인 절차까지 제시했어요.
입장을 분명히 밝혔어요.
두 학생의 의견을 언급했어요.
이유와 예시를 들었어요.
I believe the expert panel should make the final decision, but residents should shape the shortlist and the requirements. Noah is right that valuable artwork is not always popular at first; many famous public sculptures were criticized before people grew to love them. However, Maya makes a fair point that residents will see the work every day, so their experience of the site matters. A practical approach would be to hold community workshops where residents explain how they use the space and what they hope it will express, and then the panel would choose the work that best responds to those needs. This gives residents real influence without limiting artistic quality.
I believe the expert panel should make the final decision, but residents should shape the shortlist and the requirements. Noah is right that valuable artwork is not always popular at first; some famous public sculptures were criticized before people grew to love them. However, Maya makes a fair point that residents will see the work every day, so their experience of the site matters. A practical approach would be to hold community workshops where residents explain how they use the space and what they hope it will express, and then the panel would choose the work that best responds to those needs. This gives residents real influence without limiting artistic quality.
"many"는 근거 없이 일반화될 수 있어 some이 안전해요.
I agree with [Name] that [position]. Admittedly, [Other] raises a valid point that [concern]. However, [my reason]. For example, [example]. Therefore, [conclusion].
두 의견을 모두 짚고 내 이유와 예시로 이어가요.
Some famous sculptures were criticized at first.
입학 레벨테스트부터 지금까지 · 최근 30일 시험 12회
기초 진단 31 / 60
어드밴스 반 승급 준비
| 시험 | 날짜 | 리딩 | 리스닝 | 전체 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 모의시험 4회 | 10/13 | 84% | 81% | 82% |
| 리딩 유형별 · 추론 | 10/11 | 75% | - | 75% |
| 리스닝 유형별 · 강의 | 10/09 | - | 70% | 70% |
| 수업 시험 · 추론 | 10/08 | 79% | - | 79% |
| 수업 시험 · 강의 듣기 | 10/06 | - | 71% | 71% |
| 모의시험 3회 | 10/01 | 78% | 74% | 76% |
| 수업 시험 · 빈칸 완성 | 09/29 | 83% | - | 83% |
| 리스닝 유형별 · 대화 | 09/27 | - | 75% | 75% |
| 모의시험 2회 | 09/24 | 73% | 70% | 71% |
| 수업 시험 · 세부 정보 | 09/20 | 81% | - | 81% |
| 리딩 유형별 · 추론 | 09/18 | 65% | - | 65% |
| 모의시험 1회 | 09/15 | 68% | 62% | 65% |
베테랑스에듀 학생은 실제 학습 기록으로 만든 성장 보고서를 언제든 확인할 수 있고, 원하면 가족과도 함께 볼 수 있습니다.
베테랑스에듀 · veteranstoefl.com · 이 페이지의 이름과 점수는 모두 예시입니다. 실제 보고서는 학습실에 저장된 기록 그대로 자동 작성됩니다.